A treatment comparison is useful when it makes the actual care clearer. It is less useful when it turns photographs, prices or the number of residents into a ranking of clinical quality. This checklist helps you record what a provider has confirmed, what remains uncertain and which questions require professional advice. It is an original preparation tool, not a validated scoring system or a recommendation that residential treatment is right for you.
Begin with the need, not the destination
Write down the main concerns prompting the search and the support already in place. Include what has changed in daily functioning, what previous treatment helped and what remains difficult. A clinician can then explain what kind of care should be considered before you compare residences.
Separate preferences from requirements. A preference for a quiet setting is different from needing a particular level of medical observation or an accessibility arrangement without which the stay would not be workable. Both matter, but they play different roles in the decision.
The NIMH information on finding help introduces routes to professional support. Use this checklist alongside that professional conversation, not to decide the necessary level of care from a website score.
Check who assesses clinical suitability
Ask who reviews the clinical information and what records they need. Distinguish an admissions conversation from a diagnostic assessment or a decision by a treating clinician. A helpful admissions team can explain the process without being the professional responsible for every clinical decision.
Ask how the provider considers current safety, physical health, medication, substance use and previous treatment. The presence of a condition on a treatment list is not enough to establish suitability for every person with that diagnosis.
Record the answer in concrete terms: the role or professional responsible, information required and how the decision will be communicated. Mark anything not yet established as unresolved rather than assuming that acceptance is guaranteed.
Understand the level of care offered
Residential psychotherapy, medical detoxification, outpatient care and acute hospital treatment are different arrangements. Ask the provider to explain its capabilities and limitations. A private residence does not automatically provide hospital facilities or medical monitoring.
When withdrawal may be relevant, ask whether medical assessment or treatment is provided directly, arranged externally or required before admission. Do not stop alcohol or a prescription to prepare for a stay. Read whether detox is needed before rehab and residential and hospital care.
If there is an immediate risk, use local medical services rather than continuing the comparison. A checklist is not a triage tool, and a promising future admission does not make a current emergency safe to wait.
Identify the proposed professionals and appointments
Ask who is expected to lead care, who coordinates it and which other professionals may be involved. A team directory can establish background and qualifications, but it does not guarantee that every listed person will work with you.
Clarify the proposed appointment pattern and which parts remain dependent on assessment. Avoid treating a large list of available therapies as if they were all included in the same program. The relevant question is what is recommended for your needs and why.
Ask how the provider explains a method, reviews progress and changes the plan. For general context, the NIMH psychotherapy overview describes questions about treatment approaches and the therapeutic relationship. It is not a list of services automatically offered by COGNIFUL.
Separate individual therapy, group therapy and shared living
These terms answer different questions. Individual therapy describes an appointment format. Group therapy is a clinical activity involving several participants. Shared accommodation describes where people live. A program may combine them in different ways, and one should not be inferred from another.
Ask which sessions are individual, which are group-based and what shared daily activities involve. Clarify whether participation expectations differ between clinical appointments and ordinary meals or excursions. Private clinical information should not be treated as a social requirement.
Read individual therapy, group therapy and shared living. Write down the actual arrangement rather than relying on a label such as personalized care.
Confirm private and shared spaces
Ask about the bedroom or suite, bathroom arrangements, common areas and the maximum number of clients. Clarify whether the limit applies throughout the stay and whether the property is shared or exclusively assigned to one client.
Photographs can introduce a setting, but ask whether they depict the actual proposed accommodation or illustrative brand material. Do not assume that every image is a guarantee of a particular room, view or activity.
COGNIFUL’s model is a private suite in a shared Mallorca residence with a maximum of four clients at any given time. Read Life at COGNIFUL and residential privacy for the distinction. A smaller capacity is not, by itself, evidence of better clinical outcomes.
Ask about support between appointments
Clarify who can be contacted outside scheduled sessions, how medication concerns are raised and what happens if symptoms change. Ask specifically about arrangements that matter to you rather than interpreting a broad phrase such as continuous support.
Differentiate practical coordination, residential presence, clinical availability and emergency care. These are not the same service. The provider should explain which is available and which requires another organization.
Record any important limit. A clear boundary helps you assess fit; an unsupported assumption about overnight or emergency staffing can leave a serious gap in the comparison. Confirm essential details before paying or traveling.
Review medication and external medical arrangements
Bring an accurate medication list and ask who will review it, who prescribes and how continuity is managed. Include other clinicians and any recent changes. A move into residential care should not leave everyone assuming that someone else is responsible.
NICE medicines-optimisation guidance highlights the importance of clear medication information and review. The medication checklist helps you prepare without making independent changes.
Ask whether external appointments, investigations or specialist care are included, separately arranged or outside the program. A general promise of comprehensive care should be translated into specific responsibilities and costs.
Compare fees using the written proposal
Compare the same components: accommodation, clinical appointments, practical coordination, meals, agreed activities and continuing-care planning. Ask which services are excluded or charged separately. A headline weekly price does not describe the entire financial commitment.
Confirm duration, payment schedule, cancellation terms and how changes or extensions are handled. This checklist is not legal or insurance advice; unclear contractual or reimbursement questions should be addressed with the relevant qualified professional or insurer.
COGNIFUL’s published fee is CHF 35,000 per person, per week, with a usual four-to-twelve-week stay reviewed individually. See fees and admissions and the treatment-quote guide for the proposal details.
Practical fit: communication, access and daily life
Ask about language, accessibility, dietary needs, family contact and essential work responsibilities. Describe concrete requirements instead of asking only whether the program is flexible. A service may be able to accommodate one need but not another.
Discuss privacy and communication with family or existing clinicians, including what requires your agreement. Avoid assuming that a relative paying for care automatically receives all clinical information.
Read family information and planning time away. Practical arrangements should make participation possible rather than becoming a set of promises nobody has confirmed.
Make continuing care part of the comparison
Ask how discharge planning begins, who will provide follow-up and what information is shared with your agreement. Distinguish planning included during the stay from later appointments or services that require a separate arrangement.
A recommendation to find a therapist is different from an accepted appointment with one. Record who is responsible for each next step and what should happen if the planned support becomes unavailable.
See continuing care and the continuing-care worksheet. The quality of the transition should not disappear from consideration because the residence itself is appealing.
A comparison table you can use
| Area | Record for each provider |
|---|---|
| Clinical fit | Who assessed it, what was considered and what remains unresolved. |
| Level of care | Medical, psychiatric and withdrawal capabilities and limits. |
| Individual plan | Expected professionals, appointments, goals and review process. |
| Residential arrangements | Private space, shared areas, client limit and actual proposed residence. |
| Support | Contact arrangements between sessions and escalation procedures. |
| Practical needs | Language, access, communication and any essential requirements. |
| Financial proposal | Included services, exclusions, total duration and conditions. |
| After the stay | Named responsibilities, follow-up arrangements and separate costs. |
Use confirmed, pending or not available beside each answer. Do not add the rows into a clinical-quality score. A single unmet essential need can matter more than several attractive features.
When two proposals are difficult to compare
Ask each provider to describe the same practical example: who would assess the concern, what appointments are proposed, how a medication question is handled and who coordinates the next stage. This can reveal differences that a list of facilities or therapy names leaves unclear.
Do not force an answer into a numerical score when the uncertainty concerns an essential need. A proposal with more detail may still be unsuitable, while a missing answer may simply require clarification. Record what evidence would resolve the question, who should provide it and whether the decision should wait until it is available.
Frequently asked questions
Should I choose the provider with the most therapies listed?
Not on that basis alone. Ask which interventions are relevant to your needs, who provides them and how they fit together. A longer menu is not a substitute for an appropriate plan.
Does a higher price guarantee better treatment?
No guarantee should be inferred from price. Compare actual clinical capability and fit, while reviewing financial terms separately.
Can I use this checklist for COGNIFUL?
Yes. Apply the same questions and ask for important answers in the individual proposal. The checklist is intended to make the decision clearer, not to predetermine it.
Evidence and sources
- NIMH: finding mental-health support.
- NIMH: psychotherapies.
- NICE NG5: medicines optimisation.
- NIAAA: understanding treatment options.
The comparison framework is an original decision aid, not a clinical assessment instrument, accreditation review or provider ranking.


